Post by rajiyakhatun406 on Feb 12, 2024 2:20:40 GMT -5
Yesterday, Chamber III, Contentious-Administrative, of the Supreme Court (TS) issued its Sentence No. which recognizes the right of an asylum seeker in the autonomous city of Ceuta to free movement, once that your application is accepted for processing, throughout the national territory . On May 6, 2019, the Administrative Litigation Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice of Madrid (TSJM) upheld the contentious-administrative appeal filed by a foreigner against the alleged dismissal by the General Directorate of the Police of the appeal filed against the resolution of the Ceuta Police Headquarters, by delegation of the General Commissariat for.
Immigration and Borders of the Ministry of the Interior, by which the inscription “valid only in Ceuta” was incorporated into the documentation that justified his Ecuador Email List status as an applicant for international protection , Such registration was annulled by the Court on the grounds that it was contrary to law and the appellant's right to move freely throughout the national territory was recognized there. ADVERTISING In response to the aforementioned ruling of the TSJM, a document preparing an appeal for cassation was presented by the State Attorney, which was admitted, upon appreciating objective interest for the formation of jurisprudence.
Specifically, it consisted of determining: “whether the asylum seeker in the autonomous city of Ceuta (or in another case, Melilla), with his application admitted for processing, has the right to free movement in Spain (with the obligation to notify changes of address). ) and, in such case, if the registration that limits the validity of the documentation accrediting your status as an applicant for international protection is in accordance with the law, to Ceuta (or in another case, Melilla).” What was the State Attorney denouncing? First of all, it warned that art. 18 of Law 12/2009, of October 30, regulating the right of asylum and subsidiary protection.
Immigration and Borders of the Ministry of the Interior, by which the inscription “valid only in Ceuta” was incorporated into the documentation that justified his Ecuador Email List status as an applicant for international protection , Such registration was annulled by the Court on the grounds that it was contrary to law and the appellant's right to move freely throughout the national territory was recognized there. ADVERTISING In response to the aforementioned ruling of the TSJM, a document preparing an appeal for cassation was presented by the State Attorney, which was admitted, upon appreciating objective interest for the formation of jurisprudence.
Specifically, it consisted of determining: “whether the asylum seeker in the autonomous city of Ceuta (or in another case, Melilla), with his application admitted for processing, has the right to free movement in Spain (with the obligation to notify changes of address). ) and, in such case, if the registration that limits the validity of the documentation accrediting your status as an applicant for international protection is in accordance with the law, to Ceuta (or in another case, Melilla).” What was the State Attorney denouncing? First of all, it warned that art. 18 of Law 12/2009, of October 30, regulating the right of asylum and subsidiary protection.