Post by account_disabled on Mar 13, 2024 1:17:39 GMT -5
The national literature on economic crime in general has surpassed a period of adolescence and reached maturity and like every subject that matures it also comes with legitimate concerns including from the perspective of the expansion of Criminal Law focused on Economic Criminal Law and the impossibility of eliminating money laundering mainly associated with banking secrecy and tax havens.
But this maturity does not eliminate the need to analyze for example didactically the intention of those practicing money laundering or simply money laundering: to give the appearance of lawfulness that originates from illicit activities product or profit from other crimes.
In practice there are numerous ways of using the benefit of a previously committed criminal offense such as for example acquiring movable or immovable property with money obtained CG Leadss through fraud or even concealing what was obtained. with the crime of embezzlement in a bank account safe locker etc. two
Hence it is stated with doctrinal security offered by André Luís Callegari that: “historically criminals have always tried to hide the fruits of their criminal activities logically assuming that the discovery of such funds by the authorities would obviously lead to the crimes that generated them ” .
On a parallel level it is possible to benefit from the previous criminal offense in a safer way from the point of view of hindering the perception and respective criminal prosecution recycling the benefits obtained from illicit activities. An attitude that is clearly more complex than the simple acquisition of something directly with the money arising from the crime without worrying about concealment or dissimulation maneuvers.
An important point: it is in the complexity of the operations of the three stages that will be presented in this article that the practice of money laundering carried out by more skilled players can be found . That is to say even though the caput of article of Federal Law as amended by Federal Law in its basic form admits that the direct or indirect product of the preceding criminal offense may be the object of crime of money laundering the concealment or immediate use of assets and values resulting directly from the commission of a crime are not enough to weigh on the agent the incidence of the “laundering law” as they do not conform to the objective and subjective requirements of the criminal type of money laundering .
Hence the most obvious starting point that this article intends to present: the stages necessary for the crime of money laundering to legally exist.
But this maturity does not eliminate the need to analyze for example didactically the intention of those practicing money laundering or simply money laundering: to give the appearance of lawfulness that originates from illicit activities product or profit from other crimes.
In practice there are numerous ways of using the benefit of a previously committed criminal offense such as for example acquiring movable or immovable property with money obtained CG Leadss through fraud or even concealing what was obtained. with the crime of embezzlement in a bank account safe locker etc. two
Hence it is stated with doctrinal security offered by André Luís Callegari that: “historically criminals have always tried to hide the fruits of their criminal activities logically assuming that the discovery of such funds by the authorities would obviously lead to the crimes that generated them ” .
On a parallel level it is possible to benefit from the previous criminal offense in a safer way from the point of view of hindering the perception and respective criminal prosecution recycling the benefits obtained from illicit activities. An attitude that is clearly more complex than the simple acquisition of something directly with the money arising from the crime without worrying about concealment or dissimulation maneuvers.
An important point: it is in the complexity of the operations of the three stages that will be presented in this article that the practice of money laundering carried out by more skilled players can be found . That is to say even though the caput of article of Federal Law as amended by Federal Law in its basic form admits that the direct or indirect product of the preceding criminal offense may be the object of crime of money laundering the concealment or immediate use of assets and values resulting directly from the commission of a crime are not enough to weigh on the agent the incidence of the “laundering law” as they do not conform to the objective and subjective requirements of the criminal type of money laundering .
Hence the most obvious starting point that this article intends to present: the stages necessary for the crime of money laundering to legally exist.